London Experience, Day 9: Oxford University Press
For July 2, the entire day was occupied by a visit to Oxford University, home to the famed “Oxford University Press.”
Much of the information presented was not particularly interesting to me; my parents and sister are the English majors. We went over much about scholarly editions of literature such as Shakespeare, and the great work that goes into interpreting ancient texts, even those from more recent ancient history.
An example that sticks out in my mind is “Oh my too too solid flesh.” Wait, was that sullied? Or sordid? Hard to tell. But through digital scholarship, you can leverage your current question against the works of others. The digital version can provide rich footnotes.
This also brings up the point about providing context – because the digital version is always detatched from the real world, context is incredibly important.
Because Shakespeare had written about the solid flesh of a human being in an earlier play, either Macbeth or Hamlet, I forget which, the modern scholar can infer that it it’s most likely this sonnet was referencing the corporeal nature of a man.
There are certainly some technical challenges in providing context – it’s a lot more than making content “machine readable.” As pointed out early, “electronic” doesn’t really mean the same thing as “digital” when it comes to e-publishing.
Finally there were some more “science centric” points made at Oxford: namely, a discussion of the White House OSTP Consultation on Public Access to Federally Supported Research Output.
A link provided for further reading:
Some key pieces of legislature:
-Research Works Act (RWA)
Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA)
FASTR bill (access to federally funded research after 5 mo.)
Library Response: SHARE: Shared Access Research Ecosystem – network of cross institutional repositories.
Publisher Response: CHORUS: Clearing House for the Open Research of the U.S. (links to publisher’s websites)